JurídicoESEN
Order (Auto)August 30, 2005

A- de 2005

The official text of this ruling is in Spanish and is shown as published by the Colombian authorities.

Reporting justice Jaime Córdoba Triviño

✓Claimant Soraya Gutierrez Arguello

✓
Topic · hard data
Demanda De Inconstitucionalidad Contra Los Articulos 1, 2, 5 Y 6 (Parciales) De La Ley 24 De 1959. Abstenerse De Pronunciarse Sobre El Escrito Presentado Por El Procurador General De La Nación Y Viceprocurador Y Ordena A La Secretaria General Se Le Corra Traslado Al Procurador Para Que Rinda El Concepto De Su Competencia
01

Topics and subtopics of the ruling

✓What the ruling decides and analyzes, as indexed by the Court's case-law reporter's office. Each topic links to every decision that addresses it.

1 topic · 1 subtopic · source: case-law reporter's topic index
02

What it decided

This decision records no constitutional review holdings. This is common in tutela rulings and orders, where the decision does not concern a legal provision.
·

Operative part (Resuelve)

✓Verbatim text of the decision, as it appears in the ruling. It complements the structured holdings above.

  1. Primero. ABSTENERSE de pronunciarse sobre el escrito presentado por el Procurador General de la Nacion el 12 de agosto de 2005, por las razones expuestas.
  2. Segundo. ORDENASE a la Secretaria General de la Corte Constitucional que, una vez se levante la suspension de terminos dentro del proceso de la referencia -con ocasion del escrito presentado por el Procurador General de la Nacion-, se le corra traslado por el termino que falte al Procurador General de la Nacion para que rinda el concepto de su competencia.
  3. Notifiquese,
Verbatim text · source: operative part of the ruling
03

The bench that decided

We distinguish who appears in the ruling (signature, vote or concurrence) from who probably sat on the Court on that date. The difference is shown by color and shape.

Separate opinions — text available1
DissentJaime Araujo Rentería
Official text from the case-law reporter · the most valuable part of the ruling: the positions that did not carry the majority.
04

How it connects

Each decision is a node in the case-law network: it cites some and is cited by others. Follow the threads.

The document’s networkthe most influential links · node size is how often the Court cites it
constitutional review unification tutela

The indexed topics and subtopics of this decision are above, in Topics and subtopics of the ruling.